-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 219
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The chains do not converge to the same posterior #1593
Comments
@Vaibhavdixit02 I think might have some comments. |
This is still an old version though (without Weave)? |
Good point @DoktorMike, the last setup with Jupyter notebooks was a little messy to work with and the diffeq tutorial didn't end up how it started out. Now that the move to jmd has been made as David is saying, I'll take a stab at updating it and hopefully we'll have better results. |
@cpfiffer opened PR that adds some of the updates missing in the first iteration of the transition to jmd, so you might want to wait until everything is updated. |
@cpfiffer Nice update. The posteriors I mentioned seems more aligned now. In the SDE example the plots look scary even though the difference in the inferred value is not big (though this of course depends on the resolution requirements of the problem which I did not look into). So purely based on the plots I would say that the SDE does not converge at all. As mentioned in the tutorial this might not be the best case for NUTS. |
The SDE example is not correct currently (TuringLang/docs#118). @mschauer and I played around with a Crank-Nicolson scheme which seemed to work quite well in a simple example: I uploaded a version with AdvancedMH only and with Turing at https://gist.github.com/devmotion/37d8d706938364eeb900bc3678860da6. |
Likely fixed by TuringLang/docs#118 |
Question on: https://github.com/TuringLang/Turing.jl/edit/master/docs/_tutorials/10_BayesianDiffEq.md
So in your excellent tutorial on Bayesian Differential Equations, you first Bayesian example does not converge. Basically each chain finds it's own posterior which is distinct from the others. I would suggest setting stricter priors such that the tutorial ends up with a success. 😇
This issue is also related to TuringLang/docs#292
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: