You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Creating a geofence and using a name that is only numbers will replace an existing record with that geofence id.
(For the record, I don't want only numeric names.. I just discovered this by chance. It'd be fine if the fix was to disallow them.)
Thank goodness for db backups, eh?
Steps to reproduce in admin interface:
Find or create a geofence you don't care to lose. Go edit it and grab id from url. Pick a normal name for this one.
To make it easy to spot the issue later: Find or create a 2nd geofence, also with a normal name, and set the geofence in Step 1 as the parent. In list of geofences, you'll see the geofence in Step 1 as the parent for this new one.
Now the fun: Create a new geofence. For the name, use the id from Step 1. Save it.
Look around at your geofences. The geofence in Step 1 looks gone. The geofence in Step 2 will have the new geofence as parent, showing that the new fence received the same id as what was created in Step 1.
NOTE: renaming an existing geofence to one that has all numbers does not seem to be a problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Creating a geofence and using a name that is only numbers will replace an existing record with that geofence id.
(For the record, I don't want only numeric names.. I just discovered this by chance. It'd be fine if the fix was to disallow them.)
Thank goodness for db backups, eh?
Steps to reproduce in admin interface:
NOTE: renaming an existing geofence to one that has all numbers does not seem to be a problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: