-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Settings parcel_sizes should not influence the profit #67
Comments
Hi @hanase , Thanks for pointing this out. We have changed @hanase, @janowicz: please take a look at https://github.com/UDST/developer/compare/fixes_months_calculation, and let me know if you have any questions or suggestions before creating a PR. Thanks!! Jessica |
Hi @jessicacamacho , thanks for looking into this! |
Hi @hanase, Thanks for your comment. I have made a modification that should solve it, weighting the developer/developer/sqftproforma.py Lines 696 to 698 in 9f3d8eb
Please let me know if you have any additional suggestions or questions. Thanks! Jessica |
This works and gives the same results for different values of parcel_sizes. Thanks @jessicacamacho ! |
The feasibility model expects users to set parcel_sizes in the yaml file (default is 10000). A comment in the code claims that the value does not matter because it cancels out in the pro-forma computation. This is true for some of the pro-forma measures. However, this settings influences the construction time and hence the profit. Here is more detail.
Probably an easy fix would be to keep the construction time on the per-sqft scale and then multiply it by the real parcel size in
_lookup_parking_cfg()
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: