Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Activity #1A #2

Open
jbericat opened this issue Oct 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Activity #1A #2

jbericat opened this issue Oct 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
Follow-Up & Resources Activity follow-up & related resources discussion thread

Comments

@jbericat
Copy link
Member

jbericat commented Oct 27, 2020

Here we could share resources related with this activity (bibliography, links, etc), as well as discuss any problem or issue we might face while performing it (English is not mandatory).

@jbericat jbericat assigned jbericat and cdelbg and unassigned jbericat and cdelbg Oct 27, 2020
@jbericat jbericat reopened this Oct 27, 2020
@jbericat jbericat changed the title Pregunta 1-a Activity #1-A Oct 27, 2020
@jbericat jbericat changed the title Activity #1-A Activity #1A Oct 27, 2020
@jbericat jbericat added the Follow-Up & Resources Activity follow-up & related resources discussion thread label Oct 27, 2020
@jbericat
Copy link
Member Author

In regards to the following activity constraint:

"- Que indiqui que el contingut del que es mostra dins el node gencat:COVID no ha de ser interpretat com a XML (donat que prové de fonts externes i no en podem garantir la validesa)."

It looks like we could use two different strategies to do so;

  1. Use the corresponding entities that replace the well-formed XML expressions
  2. Use the <[CDATA[...]]> construct

References --> Pages 40 & 41 from the subject's documentation: "Module 2: Relational Extensions".

@jbericat
Copy link
Member Author

I'm attaching here a first approach of the conceptual xml tree (once the tree is perfectly done, traslating it into xml is trivial).

In the png, what's in red is stuff i'm not quite sure is correct:

xml-tree_v1

Any comments will be very welcome :D

@jbericat
Copy link
Member Author

jbericat commented Nov 4, 2020

activity 99% done* and ready to be pullled into master from branch "jordi_v2.0".

*(if we have time, we can ask in the forum about the proper way to construct the CDATA. Anyway, I think it will be enough to use the placeholder [...] --> see comment [6] in "activity_1/activity_1A.xml" )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Follow-Up & Resources Activity follow-up & related resources discussion thread
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants