MonitoringLocation/Assessment Unit Crosswalk

[hillarymarler]

Some thoughts after a discussion with @wokenny13 about providing users the option to summarize criteria comparison results by either monitoring location or assessment unit:

• A monitoring location/assessment unit crosswalk could be required user input if user wants to summarize by assessment unit
• TADA_MakeSpatial could be leveraged to generate a draft cross walk (which would need to be reviewed by the user)
• Monitoring locations that are not matched with an assessment unit or that are matched with more than one assessment unit should be flagged --> then this subset could be easily passed to TADA_ViewSpatial for review
• Maybe an additional function could be used to compare the crosswalk from the previous cycle with the new one generated from the current TADA dataframe with the option to filter to highlight either mismatches (different AU assigned previously) or new monitoring location/assessment unit pairs. That way users would be prompted to review and assign only new monitoring locations if they are satisfied that their crosswalk from previous years is correct.
• Can this be formatted to be ATTAINS compatible so users could store their completed crosswalk in ATTAINS if desired?
• Do any other columns (for usability) need to be included in the crosswalk? Organization? Characteristics available? Date range sampled? etc.