Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Unlikely that using list as queue is more performant than iterating list #2

Open
lastobelus opened this issue May 27, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Unlikely that using list as queue is more performant than iterating list #2

lastobelus opened this issue May 27, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@lastobelus
Copy link

Have you benchmarked using List as a queue vs. iterating the list to find an inactive GameObject? I'd be willing to make a considerable bet that iterating costs much less for typical pool sizes.
@diego3
Copy link

diego3 commented May 6, 2016

+1

@foldcc
Copy link

foldcc commented Mar 12, 2019 •
edited
Loading

++ 10086

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@lastobelus @diego3 @foldcc