Details

Maybe the Stanford Library folks would want to contribute to FI+ development. Before we meet with them, could we make sure the readme is up to date? I had 3 things in mind:

1. In general, is the documentation accurate?

2. Can we add a sentence or two about the status of the project for orgs that would want to ingest transcripts/assets outside the context of the AAPB?

3. Check our branding, credits, and attribution. In particular, might we want to add ourselves to the last line that currently says this:

Though it’s not required, if you would like to credit us as the source we recommend using the following statement and links:
Powered by the Open Transcript Editor created by The New York Public Library with generous support from the Knight Prototype Fund.

(I'm submitting this ticket as "urgent" because it has the most value in advance of our meeting next Wednesday. Obviously, though, it's not at all "urgent" in the sense of being mission critical.)

Submitted by: Owen
CC in communications:
Priority: Urgent (within the next 1-2 days)
URL: https://github.com/WGBH-MLA/transcript-editor/blob/master/README.md
Slack message thread: https://wgbh.slack.com/archives/GMFPBR44V/p1721395277798789