Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WISE FR]: Version tracking for WISE components in FGMJ files #197

Open
4 tasks
RobBryce opened this issue Mar 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
4 tasks

[WISE FR]: Version tracking for WISE components in FGMJ files #197

RobBryce opened this issue Mar 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature This is a feature request

Comments

@RobBryce
Copy link
Collaborator

RobBryce commented Mar 6, 2023

Contact Details

[email protected]

What is needed?

I would like to suggest that we add 1 or more fields to the FGMJ project file, to identify the version of WISE Builder and EXE that produced and handled the file.

If Builder built the file, then it should insert a version string so it's clear what built it.
If WISE.EXE later saved out the file, then it should insert a string so that's also clear. This field may want to be an array to track multiple saves of the file. Otherwise, we need to define if it's the first time the file is saved by WISE.exe, or the last time it's saved out.

A 3rd field may be useful if you want to track other tools that may modify the file. But the 2nd field may be suitable if it's not limited to just WISE.

A date/time with creation and each save may be useful too. User or system ID's may be interesting but may become protected data if you look at the user ID of the (Linux) account handling the file, so that may be too far.

How will this improve the project or tool?

Provide an audit trail on how a file was created, and maybe saved out, to track possible bugs that need fixed in files, revision control, etc. We already store a version field for the version of the file, but not of the components that touch it.

Approvals Process

  • Testing For Issue
  • Executive Approval
  • Merge
  • Provide Attribution
@RobBryce RobBryce added the feature This is a feature request label Mar 6, 2023
@BadgerOnABike
Copy link
Collaborator

I like fingerprints. Makes debugging more targetted.

@spydmobile
Copy link
Collaborator

Yup im all for this one too

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature This is a feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants