Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-signing Xcode 8.3.2 failed on Mac 10.12.4: resource fork, Finder information, or similar detritus not allowed #1064

Open
Vidtion opened this issue Apr 24, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@Vidtion
Copy link

Vidtion commented Apr 24, 2017

Description

in a terminal,

$ sudo codesign -f -s XcodeSigner /Applications/Xcode.app

got this:

/Applications/Xcode.app: replacing existing signature
/Applications/Xcode.app: resource fork, Finder information, or similar detritus not allowed

Environments

  • Xcode Version [ 8.3.2 ]
  • XVim branch and revision [ develop / https://github.com/XVimProject/XVim/commit/fa5224bdc65c304bb49d079d0960a2f970e44462 ]
  • Keyboard Language [ English US ]
  • Input source language [ English US ]
@Vidtion Vidtion changed the title Re-signing Xcode failed: resource fork, Finder information, or similar detritus not allowed Re-signing Xcode 8.3.2 failed on Mac 10.12.4: resource fork, Finder information, or similar detritus not allowed Apr 24, 2017
@ykws
Copy link

ykws commented Apr 24, 2017

@Vidtion Did you refer to #1063 ?

@externvoid
Copy link

externvoid commented Apr 26, 2017

Could you attempt unsign command at github.com/steakknife/unsign?

$cd unsign
$make
$./unsign /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/MacOS/Xcode
$cd /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/MacOS/Xcode
$mv Xcode Xcode.sined
$mv Xcode.unsigned Xcode

The similer tool of the unsign is github.com/alexzielenski/optool.

@hanl001
Copy link

hanl001 commented May 17, 2017

you should create an other sign and Re-signing Xcode again

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants