We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi @fpjentzsch, I ran into the same problem and I tried the same thing with ResNet-50 but it still failed.
I ran into a problem while executing model.transform(CreateDataflowPartition()).
model.transform(CreateDataflowPartition())
I made some adjustments and tests (see #860 (comment) for details), but the error still occurred.
Then I looked at the answers in this issue, and I used the ResNet-50 process to re-tune my code, but I was still stuck.
Part of the onnx file when resnet-50 is not used, see #860 (comment)
Part of the onnx file when using resnet-50, as follows.
I guessed that it was due to the concat operation, so I stopped using concat and split all the output, but still had the same problem.
Originally posted by @Special-zhang in #431 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi @fpjentzsch,
I ran into the same problem and I tried the same thing with ResNet-50 but it still failed.
In detail
I ran into a problem while executing
model.transform(CreateDataflowPartition())
.I made some adjustments and tests (see #860 (comment) for details), but the error still occurred.
Then I looked at the answers in this issue, and I used the ResNet-50 process to re-tune my code, but I was still stuck.
Part of the onnx file when resnet-50 is not used, see #860 (comment)
Part of the onnx file when using resnet-50, as follows.
I guessed that it was due to the concat operation, so I stopped using concat and split all the output, but still had the same problem.
I hope you can help me solve this problem.
Thanks again.
Originally posted by @Special-zhang in #431 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: