You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi:
I tried to use cv.grpregOverlap with grLasso,grMCP and grSCAD for same dataset(6000 observations and 500 variables ) and group to fit the logistic regression. The three penality all work well.
But when I subset the dataset with less variables and redefine the group, grLasso just returns NA for all the coefficients. grMCP and grSCAD still works well.
In addition, I also tried the function grpregOverlap for both the original set and the subset, grLasso works for both conditions.
Why grLasso does not work when I just reduce the number of variables and using cross-validation?
Could you please check this? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
computingmachine
changed the title
grLasso does not work
grLasso does not work with cv.grpregOverlap for a smaller dataset
Jan 29, 2018
Hi @YaohuiZeng, I encountered the same problem recently.
It seems to be due to the fact that my dataframe used for running cv.grpsurvOverlap has column with constant value (column of zeros).
It would be great if you could fix this !
Hi:
I tried to use cv.grpregOverlap with grLasso,grMCP and grSCAD for same dataset(6000 observations and 500 variables ) and group to fit the logistic regression. The three penality all work well.
But when I subset the dataset with less variables and redefine the group, grLasso just returns NA for all the coefficients. grMCP and grSCAD still works well.
In addition, I also tried the function grpregOverlap for both the original set and the subset, grLasso works for both conditions.
Why grLasso does not work when I just reduce the number of variables and using cross-validation?
Could you please check this? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: