You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We asked for 800 ms plus 250 ms for Oli's figure and we get the following:
The data are measured with a photodiode and it's possible the start of the rampdown is being missed due to saturation. Over all it is running for the correct time period but maybe we need to tweak how the ramp down happens.
This may be a minor bug or may be a measurement error.
Possibly @omgauld001 had an older version with a bug? Or possibly the photodiode was saturated? The lack of the last pulses might be due to the fact that the laser cuts off at very low powers.
This was a measurement taken in Aug 2023. The stim is 500 ms and then 250 ms rampdown. The rampdown starts at the right time, but again it seems like the last laser pulse is not delivered.
We asked for 800 ms plus 250 ms for Oli's figure and we get the following:
![Screenshot 2024-02-06 at 22 52 37](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/5427811/302790015-b3ce56b9-e2cd-44a0-854b-4ffd238e574e.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.V9W3haiDr8xpM6_43yAgP7L971PElUp-fFAOyrnebHs)
The data are measured with a photodiode and it's possible the start of the rampdown is being missed due to saturation. Over all it is running for the correct time period but maybe we need to tweak how the ramp down happens.
This may be a minor bug or may be a measurement error.
Data from @omgauld001
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: