Skip to content

Issues: aarnphm/tinymorph

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

30 Open 35 Closed
30 Open 35 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

chore: improve hazard analysis clarity, formatting, and traceability
#162 opened Dec 22, 2024 by nebrask
7 tasks
chore: improve clarity, formality, and traceability in srs
#161 opened Dec 22, 2024 by nebrask
13 tasks
peer review: Missing Benchmarks for Performance Metrics Justification review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#156 opened Nov 25, 2024 by RasikPokharel
peer review: Lack of Action Item Tracking Mechanism in Review Sessions review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#155 opened Nov 25, 2024 by RasikPokharel
peer review: <Parisha Nizam Team 22> Be more descriptive in Test cases results review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#151 opened Nov 7, 2024 by parishanizam
peer review: <Promish Kandel Team 22> Testcases have too ridged ranges that could cause issues with varying variables review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#149 opened Nov 6, 2024 by PromishKandel
peer review: <Promish Kandel Team 22> Missing a section on what is a defined as a critcal path. review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#148 opened Nov 6, 2024 by PromishKandel
peer review: <Mitchell Weingust Team 22> Planning and Suggestion Features missing outcome decisions review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#147 opened Nov 5, 2024 by mitcholll
peer review: <Mitchell Weingust Team 22> Verification and Validation Team Breakdown is Too General review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#146 opened Nov 5, 2024 by mitcholll
peer review: <Jasmine Sun-Hu Team 22> V&V Missing Symbolic Parameters review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#145 opened Nov 5, 2024 by jasminesunhu
peer review: <Mitchell Weingust Team 22> Inconsistencies between FMEA table and Hazards Out of Scope review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#128 opened Oct 27, 2024 by mitcholll
peer review: <Mitchell Weingust Team 22> All Critical Assumptions Not Covered review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#127 opened Oct 27, 2024 by mitcholll
peer review: <Jasmine Sun-Hu Team 22> H6 Not Acknowledged review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#126 opened Oct 27, 2024 by jasminesunhu
peer review: <Jasmine Sun-Hu Team 22> Safety & Security Requirements Imported From SRS and Not Displayed review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#125 opened Oct 27, 2024 by jasminesunhu
1
peer review: <Promish Kandel Team 22> FMEA components shouldn't have general review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#124 opened Oct 27, 2024 by PromishKandel
peer review: <Promish Kandel Team 22> Introduction needs to define what a hazard is review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#123 opened Oct 27, 2024 by PromishKandel
peer review: <Parisha Nizam Team 22> - Missing Formal Specification review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#110 opened Oct 15, 2024 by parishanizam
1
peer review: <Parisha Nizam Team 22> - Missing Traceability Matrix review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#109 opened Oct 15, 2024 by parishanizam
1
peer review: <Mitchell Weingust Team 22> 21 Tasks - Missing critical project planning decisions and deadlines review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#108 opened Oct 14, 2024 by mitcholll
peer review: <Mitchell Weingust Team 22> 8.1 Product Boundary - Use Case Diagram should be expanded on review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#107 opened Oct 14, 2024 by mitcholll
peer review: <Promish Team 22> BUC's should be companied by a diagram review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#106 opened Oct 14, 2024 by PromishKandel
@waleedmalik7
1
peer review: <Promish Kandel Team 22> For all of the requirements their is no fit critrion or it isn't apparent review To be used with different parties for review purposes
#105 opened Oct 14, 2024 by PromishKandel
1
chore: problem statement and development plan adjustment documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#102 opened Oct 12, 2024 by aarnphm
17 tasks
@aarnphm
final demo
#48 opened Sep 20, 2024 by aarnphm
v&v report
#47 opened Sep 20, 2024 by aarnphm
ProTip! no:milestone will show everything without a milestone.