-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: liquidity mining update #7
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hello @ncitron, yes BUSD aToken and debt tokens are still not updated to the latest AToken or Debt token revisions. The update of incentives or the needed update of the AToken version or the Debt tokens can only be performed via Governance proposal and voted by the Aave community. You could propose to update those tokens and the incentives at the same proposal at the community forum. |
Yep, that's the current plan. ARC is linked here: https://governance.aave.com/t/arc-aave-v2-liquidity-mining-program-90-days-at-30-reduced-rate/5946 |
Also should I take the gas refund from the ecosystem reserved @ernesto-usal? |
@ncitron if deploying the aToken/debtToken, definitely I think it is a good idea to transfer some AAVE to compensate the deployment cost, describing it on the text of the proposal |
Yep! I've added a 70 AAVE transfer from the eco reserver to one of our wallets which should be more than enough to cover gas. I have also added it to the proposal text. |
To test, run
npm run test-update-proposal
.This is just about ready. The only thing missing currently is the correct emissions values. One thing I noticed that was strange is that aBUSD does not have a
scaledTotalSuopply
. Is this just because it is using an older version of the contracts? Is it safe to upgrade BUSD's aToken and variabelDebtToken implementation to the most recent version?