You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, suppa2 can get information about alternative splicing events based on GTF files.
When I use one sample for Isoquant analysis to get GTF, a gene in it contains intron retention events, but when I use all the samples (I measured 3 periods, 2 replicates), surprisingly I found that the total GTF file I got does not have any intron retention of this gene, what is the reason for this, is it because of the inaccurate structural annotation of GTFs obtained from a single sample? Here is the specific description in SUPPA2.
By the way, is it still necessary to do SQANTI3 again for the structural annotation file obtained with Isoquant, because when I did SQANTI3 analysis with the GTF obtained with isoquant, it was found that the structural annotations of some transcripts were different.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In general, it's quite hard to predict the outcome of the transcript discovery algorithm - it uses a lot of different cut-offs, including cut-offs relative to gene expression. Thus, when a gene gets more reads, some novel isoforms may appear to have insufficient read support. Moreover, when providing several replicas, IsoQuant reports a novel isoform only if it's confirmed by at least 2 of them. Thus, it may also happen that some of the novel isoforms were lost due to lack of support in different replicas/samples.
By the way, is it still necessary to do SQANTI3 again for the structural annotation file obtained with Isoquant, because when I did SQANTI3 analysis with the GTF obtained with isoquant, it was found that the structural annotations of some transcripts were different.
Could you send me an example where SQANTI and IsoQuant output differs?
The top GTF is the original reference GTF obtained from short-read RNA-seq (containing only the gene level as a reference), the second is the transcript_models.gtf obtained by Isoquant, the third is the corrected GTF obtained by SQANTI3, and the fourth contains the predicted CDS sequence.
Hi @andrewprzh
Thanks in advance.
First, suppa2 can get information about alternative splicing events based on GTF files.
When I use one sample for Isoquant analysis to get GTF, a gene in it contains intron retention events, but when I use all the samples (I measured 3 periods, 2 replicates), surprisingly I found that the total GTF file I got does not have any intron retention of this gene, what is the reason for this, is it because of the inaccurate structural annotation of GTFs obtained from a single sample? Here is the specific description in SUPPA2.
comprna/SUPPA#207
By the way, is it still necessary to do SQANTI3 again for the structural annotation file obtained with Isoquant, because when I did SQANTI3 analysis with the GTF obtained with isoquant, it was found that the structural annotations of some transcripts were different.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: