Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement stats Rest and Realtime clients #260

Closed
ben-xD opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #310 · May be fixed by #324
Closed

Implement stats Rest and Realtime clients #260

ben-xD opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #310 · May be fixed by #324
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or improved functionality.

Comments

@ben-xD
Copy link
Contributor

ben-xD commented Nov 25, 2021

Implement following methods in Rest and Realtime

@override
Future<DateTime> time() {

and

These methods throw UnimplementedError();.

┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Story by Unito

@ben-xD ben-xD added the enhancement New feature or improved functionality. label Nov 25, 2021
@ben-xD ben-xD self-assigned this Nov 25, 2021
@ikbalkaya ikbalkaya assigned ikbalkaya and unassigned ben-xD Dec 14, 2021
This was referenced Dec 14, 2021
@ikbalkaya ikbalkaya linked a pull request Dec 14, 2021 that will close this issue
@ikbalkaya ikbalkaya removed a link to a pull request Dec 15, 2021
This was linked to pull requests Dec 29, 2021
@ikbalkaya ikbalkaya changed the title Implement methods in Rest and Realtime clients Implement stats Rest and Realtime clients Jan 24, 2022
@ikurek ikurek assigned ikurek and unassigned ikbalkaya Feb 4, 2022
This was linked to pull requests Feb 9, 2022
@ably-sync-bot
Copy link

➤ Igor Kurek commented:

For now I’m moving this to blocked, Stats implementation is done on #324 ( https://github.com/ably/ably-flutter/pull/324|smart-link ) but it requires ably/ably-java#733 ( https://github.com/ably/ably-java/issues/733|smart-link ) and ably/ably-cocoa#1284 ( https://github.com/ably/ably-cocoa/issues/1284|smart-link ) to be solved first

@QuintinWillison
Copy link
Contributor

To explain why this issue was closed, it was a duplicate of #106.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or improved functionality.
5 participants