-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
notes.txt
45 lines (28 loc) · 1.51 KB
/
notes.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
I would like to typify every sentence used in this summery into half a dozem categories.
I am writing about Deacon's work who in turn writes about other people's work who in turn write about yet other people's work.
When I write a sentence I want to be able to identify the source amd purpose of that sentence.
First: Does the sentence I write summarize a thought belonging to Deacon or another?
Second: is the matrerial 'fresh meat' or somrthing else.
All of this is part of the process of mechanizing the process of creating a summary.
***
#description
A restating of knowledge that is generally thought to be true/readily obsrvable/reproducuble/evidence-based among the well-read.
#recapitulation [ recap]:
A summary of a particular person's thoughts or research.
Text that may be independently verified and cross-checked for veracity.
Very often historical in nature
- also history? What would be the difference between the two?
#observation:
A comment or opinion offered by the author regarding the recapitulation or description
- more personal in nature
- less frequently observed/above the mormal point of view.
#criticism:
- A finding by the author of an issue/error/caveat in the thinking out of a procress described in a recapitulation
#assertion:
- A statement or position taken by the authour that is fresh meat
#example:
- a thought experiment offered as justification/guidance
#parable:
- A descriptive metaphor or example of an observation
- Often used to introduce a complex observation
#question