You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The application layer in the current design is message-oriented, while BASP is stream-oriented. We should think about reworking the current stream-oriented design to be message oriented, so that the underlying communication model stays
consistent.
An easy way to do so would be an adaptor that is situated directly on top of the transport abstraction. This adaptor could process the received data and create a message that is passed on further up the stack. This way, working with datagrams is less of a problem, while this change would not affect stream and message oriented transport protocols.
The application layer in the current design is message-oriented, while
BASP
is stream-oriented. We should think about reworking the current stream-oriented design to be message oriented, so that the underlying communication model staysconsistent.
An easy way to do so would be an adaptor that is situated directly on top of the transport abstraction. This adaptor could process the received data and create a message that is passed on further up the stack. This way, working with datagrams is less of a problem, while this change would not affect stream and message oriented transport protocols.
What do you think about this idea @Neverlord ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: