Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The problem with attachments in shorthand... #11

Open
ty- opened this issue Apr 9, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

The problem with attachments in shorthand... #11

ty- opened this issue Apr 9, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@ty-
Copy link
Contributor

ty- commented Apr 9, 2015

There is a lot of upfront data you need to provide for this to be translatable. While Remarks can technically support attachments from a syntactical standpoint, there is a barrier for usage.

Assumptions cannot be made on the required fields, so a user must provide the following information:

  • display name
  • usageType
  • contentType
  • length
  • sha2

No more information than what they would have to provide while creating an xAPI Statement, however.

An alternative option is to return placeholders for everything but display name... the statement won't not be valid in this case though and could put #10 outside the realm of possibility.

@ty- ty- added the feedback label Apr 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant