You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There should be a mode where private DLL symbols are not used for the purposes of ODRV detection. It doesn't mean those symbols cannot contribute to an ODRV, however. For example, if a DLL has its own implementations of new and delete and passes a dynamically allocated object across its DLL boundary, it would be (de)allocated with a mismatched pair of new and delete routines. Even so, such a filtering would help eliminate direct false positives for symbols that appear to conflict between components, but actually do not as one or more of them may be private.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There should be a mode where private DLL symbols are not used for the purposes of ODRV detection. It doesn't mean those symbols cannot contribute to an ODRV, however. For example, if a DLL has its own implementations of
new
anddelete
and passes a dynamically allocated object across its DLL boundary, it would be (de)allocated with a mismatched pair ofnew
anddelete
routines. Even so, such a filtering would help eliminate direct false positives for symbols that appear to conflict between components, but actually do not as one or more of them may be private.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: