Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 2 new commands to run.py #13

Open
golnazads opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add 2 new commands to run.py #13

golnazads opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@golnazads
Copy link
Contributor

We need to have the following functionality:
python get_references -b <source_bibcode> (generates prioritized, merged list)
python get_references -b <source_bibcode> -a (returns all references with corresponding origin)

@ehenneken
Copy link
Member

@golnazads I don't think we need this functionality in the pipeline, definitely not the first one. I have written a utility to do this type of extracting from the reference pipeline database, to support the integration into the Classic workflow. But in the (near?) future, all of this will go away when Honeycomb will take over all aggregating and merging of data.

@golnazads
Copy link
Contributor Author

@edwin I have been working on this for a few days now and should have it done soon. I understand Honeycomb might eventually handle everything, but I do not think it can fully do what is needed here without the changes I am making to the database and pipeline. I am confident these updates will help bridge the gap until Honeycomb is fully in place.
@aaccomazzi

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants