Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Weekly Report - 10/11/2016 #35

Open
amritbhanu opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Weekly Report - 10/11/2016 #35

amritbhanu opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@amritbhanu
Copy link
Contributor

amritbhanu commented Oct 11, 2016

DOING:

  • judging the credibility of LDA of how many words should be reported for each topic.
  • experiment with tuned 7 words, against default 7 words, and 10 words.
  • reviewing the LDA Papers

DONE:

  • Check Credibility Of LDA #34
  • expected was tuned 7 words should perform the same than untuned 7 words and bad than untuned 10 words
  • but tuned 7 words performed better than both. (WIN SITUATION ie TUNING HELPED)

TODO:

  • redo anything after getting feedback for above results
  • Does stability help classification? with about the same K (default and untuned), better alpha and beta help?
  • LDA+word vector featurization better than LDA features.

roadblocks:

  • wanted to reproduce this paper
  • but the link provided is not working. Have emailed the author but no response.

admin:

  • can above be solved?
@amritbhanu
Copy link
Contributor Author

found the link now can test our results against LDA-GA - https://dibt.unimol.it/reports/LDA-GA/

@timm
Copy link

timm commented Oct 21, 2016

ru wiring ONE report per project?

or ONE report per person? the preferred is one report/person

@amritbhanu
Copy link
Contributor Author

one per person, last 2 weekly reports were related to different repos.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants