Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions about the training resolution and auxiliary network. #77

Open
whyygug opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Questions about the training resolution and auxiliary network. #77

whyygug opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@whyygug
Copy link

whyygug commented Sep 25, 2023

Your work is really excellent and I am having some issues with your code. Can you provide me with some guidance? Thank you very much!

  1. If I want to train at a lower resolution (like 256x256), which arguments should I change, is it just changing '__C.DATASET.CROP_SIZE = (448, 448)' to '__C.DATASET.CROP_SIZE = (256, 256)'? Also, should the settings of the normal loss function be changed with the resolution? (e.g., should the sampling distance or number of sampled points also be appropriately lowered? If so, can you give me some advice?Many Thanks!!)

  2. You use an auxiliary training network to output disparity, can you tell me if the auxiliary structure significantly improves performance, or it only provides slight improvement? Is the auxiliary structure necessary for high-quality depth prediction? I'm trying to replace your main model structure with monodepth2's ResNet18 based network that outputs disparity, so I can't use a redundant auxiliary disparity prediction network for training, and I'm concerned that discarding the auxiliary structure will significantly impact performance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant