Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Respond to referee report #83

Open
6 of 16 tasks
aimalz opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 0 comments
Open
6 of 16 tasks

Respond to referee report #83

aimalz opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@aimalz
Copy link
Owner

aimalz commented Sep 22, 2020

The referee requests the following:

  • Upgrade to Python 3.
  • Calculate and include concrete benchmarking values of computational expense.
  • Assess accuracy of MCMC error bars on distribution of n(z) samples.
  • Add back cosmology forecast.
  • Cite an appearance of the analytic n(z) of Eqn. 13.
  • Explain chippr's overestimate at redshift extrema.
  • Remove repeated sentence in conclusion.

I would like to take this opportunity to do the following:

  • Cite more recent n(z) estimation papers. (also 2011.01836)
  • Update references (for publication status and formatting).
  • Rerun with lower Gelman-Rubin threshold.
  • Calculate and plot Delta z.
  • Clean up demo notebook with CosmoLike propagation.
  • Put CosmoLike data files on GitHub so others can run forecasting notebook.
  • Eliminate redundant plotting code.
  • Refactor and write unit tests.
  • Isolate catalog generation code and migrate to zeppole.
@aimalz aimalz self-assigned this Sep 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant