For the LLaMa-7B fp16 model with a maximum length of 2048, the server requires approximately 1030MB of GPU memory to store kv_cache for each concurrent session created. This means that even an A100 80G can only serve a limited number of users.
To reduce runtime GPU memory usage, we have implemented PTQ quantization for kv cache, using the following formula:
zp = (min+max) / 2
scale = (max-min) / 255
quant: q = round( (f-zp) / scale)
dequant: f = q * scale + zp
Get the quantization parameters and save them to the original HF model directory:
# get minmax
export HF_MODEL=internlm/internlm-chat-7b
lmdeploy lite calibrate \
$HF_MODEL \
--calib-dataset 'ptb' \
--calib-samples 128 \
--calib-seqlen 2048 \
--work-dir $HF_MODEL
Test the chat performance. Note that setting --quant-policy 4
would set to KV Cache int8 mode.
lmdeploy chat turbomind $HF_MODEL --model-format hf --quant-policy 4
The test object is the internlm-chat-7b model. Testing method:
- Use
deploy.py
to convert the model, modify the maximum concurrency in theworkspace
configuration; adjust the number of requests inllama_config.ini
. - Compile and run
bin/llama_triton_example
to obtain the GPU memory situation of the fp16 version under different batch_size. - Enable quantization, re-run
bin/llama_triton_example
to obtain the GPU memory situation of the int8 version under different batch_size.
Below shows the comparison of GPU memory between the two versions:
batch_size | fp16 memory(MiB) | int8 memory(MiB) | diff(MiB) |
---|---|---|---|
8 | 22337 | 18241 | -4096 |
16 | 30593 | 22369 | -8224 |
32 | 47073 | 30625 | -16448 |
48 | 63553 | 38881 | -24672 |
Compared to directly quantizing Weight (such as GPTQ-for-LLaMa), we have done a comparative estimation of memory growth in the 7B model for both methods, with some data from llama.cpp.
As can be seen, the fp16 version requires 1030MB of GPU memory for each concurrency, so quantizing kv_cache can significantly reduce the rate of increase of runtime memory.
The test object is the internlm-chat-7b command model.
Below is the result of PTQ quantization of kCacheKVInt8
method with only 128 randomly selected data from the c4 dataset. The accuracy was tested using opencompass before and after quantization.
task | dataset | metric | int8 | fp16 | diff |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Language | winogrande | accuracy | 60.77 | 61.48 | -0.71 |
Knowledge | nq | score | 2.69 | 2.60 | +0.09 |
Reasoning | gsm8k | accuracy | 33.28 | 34.72 | -1.44 |
Reasoning | bbh | naive_average | 20.12 | 20.51 | -0.39 |
Understanding | openbookqa_fact | accuracy | 82.40 | 82.20 | +0.20 |
Understanding | eprstmt-dev | accuracy | 90.62 | 88.75 | +1.87 |
Safety | crows_pairs | accuracy | 32.56 | 31.43 | +1.13 |
Note that both kCacheKVInt8
and WeightInt4
methods can be enabled at the same time.
Please refer to w4a16 do WeightInt4
and then
start chat like:
lmdeploy chat turbomind ./internlm-chat-7b-4bit --model-format awq --quant-policy 4