You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for developing g3plot. It's really quite nice.
I'm trying to extend the demo app to make similar plots for my own data. On the x-axis, I have date, and on the y-axis I have "individual ID", which spans the range from 0 to 418. At the moment, I have been able to recreate something like the Indometh_plot and everything looks good EXCEPT the y-axis is cutting off at 100 individuals. When highlighting a portion of the plot, the data table below (which is sorted in a bizzare order for reasons unclear to me) correctly updates to reflect only the highlighted individuals, and in fact contains the individuals not visible on the plot (ie. those which should be present above the problematic 100-individual threshold on the y-axis corresponding to the highlighted region on the x-axis). Do you have any thoughts on what might be causing this problem?
Thanks very much.
Best,
Caitlin.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
Thanks for developing g3plot. It's really quite nice.
I'm trying to extend the demo app to make similar plots for my own data. On the x-axis, I have date, and on the y-axis I have "individual ID", which spans the range from 0 to 418. At the moment, I have been able to recreate something like the Indometh_plot and everything looks good EXCEPT the y-axis is cutting off at 100 individuals. When highlighting a portion of the plot, the data table below (which is sorted in a bizzare order for reasons unclear to me) correctly updates to reflect only the highlighted individuals, and in fact contains the individuals not visible on the plot (ie. those which should be present above the problematic 100-individual threshold on the y-axis corresponding to the highlighted region on the x-axis). Do you have any thoughts on what might be causing this problem?
Thanks very much.
Best,
Caitlin.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: