Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PB Converter - Installation Error #1

Open
pcarass opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

PB Converter - Installation Error #1

pcarass opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@pcarass
Copy link

pcarass commented Aug 2, 2020

Hey @alexed1
Just tried to install the Process Builder Converter into one of my orgs and got the following error:

Screenshot 2020-08-02 at 15 36 06

Have you seen this before?
Thanks
Paul

@pcarass
Copy link
Author

pcarass commented Aug 7, 2020

Hey @alexed1 Have you seen this issue happen before?
Thanks
Paul

@coryjarcher
Copy link

@alexed1 Seeing a similar error to the above when trying to install with 2.32 / 2.5.5 of the prereqs installed:

  1. (Demo_Multiple_Scheduled_Paths) myWaitEvent_myWait_myRule_1_event_1_SA1 (Action) - A required input parameter is missing: "Product"
    Demo_Multiple_Scheduled_Paths: myWaitEvent_myWait_myRule_1_event_1_SA1 (Action) - A required input parameter is missing: "Product"

Any ideas? Not finding much. Able to install the original package (1.0) but not the updated.

@yochevreux
Copy link

Hi @alexed1, I encoutered a similar issue
Demo_Process_A_Recursion: formula_myRule_1 (Formula) - The formula expression is invalid: Field myVariable_current.DandbCompany.SalesVolume does not exist. Check spelling.

It seems that Data.com objects and fields are removed from orgs when Data.com licences are expired.

@alexed1
Copy link
Owner

alexed1 commented Sep 13, 2021

@yochevreux , so you're saying that something like this happened:
At timepoint 1, Data.com licenses were added to the org, creating a SalesVolume object.
At timepoint 2, a PB process was created that used SalesVolume
At timepoint 3, the licenses were removed and the PB process became quietly invalid. Because licenses trump referential integrity protections, the licenses were not prevented from being removed.
at the present time, a flow can't be created because the object doesn't exist.

This is an interesting use case that I hadn't thought of. Thanks for the insight.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants