Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cannot restore #11

Open
sharicov opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 8 comments
Open

cannot restore #11

sharicov opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 8 comments

Comments

@sharicov
Copy link

POP Linux
Mapped NTFS source disk (local)
after selecting image file getting following error in terminal:
ERROR apart_core::server] RestoreJob creation failed: /usr/sbin/partclone.ntfs.81.4GiB not found
Probable cause: file was renamed manually
Without renaming restore works fine

@alexheretic
Copy link
Owner

The filename is used to indicate the partclone binary name & decompression used in restoring.

{name}-{timestamp}.apt.{partclone_variant}.{z_name}

So the bits after apt shouldn't be changed.

If clones images have been renamed, they can be renamed back again to fix them.

You could also manually decompress & use partclone directly to restore.

@sharicov
Copy link
Author

sharicov commented Oct 21, 2020 via email

@alexheretic
Copy link
Owner

I suppose if you wanted to keep the renames you could keep symbolic links to those renamed files that had correct naming.

@sharicov
Copy link
Author

sharicov commented Oct 21, 2020 via email

@alexheretic
Copy link
Owner

thanks, seems too complicated for daily use.

Yes I agree. But the simple solution is, not manually renaming the clones to begin with. Can you help me understand why this is necessary?

@sharicov
Copy link
Author

sharicov commented Oct 21, 2020 via email

@alexheretic
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the details. Maybe you could click "clone" for each and give it a name that way, rather than rerunning the clone.

Or if you do rename, change just the stuff before .apt.ntfs.zst, as long as the end of the filename is unchanged it should work fine.

Regarding the custom iso, there is rpm & deb prebuilt packages included with each release https://github.com/alexheretic/apart-gtk/releases/tag/v0.24 & it's also available in AUR.

@sharicov
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much, still think storing description file would be a nice touch, however it is a lot of work to implement...
Regards deb file, I am aware, however ISO building is only working with repositories for some reason.
Would be great if your program would be included in Debian repository!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants