Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Script incorrectly detected as simplified #10

Open
jiru opened this issue Feb 19, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Script incorrectly detected as simplified #10

jiru opened this issue Feb 19, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@jiru
Copy link
Contributor

jiru commented Feb 19, 2015

Tommy spot an error for sentence #3718946: it’s detected as simplified but should be displayed as traditional. It only contains characters used in both traditional and simplified.

@allan-simon Is there something you can think about to solve that problem?

@allan-simon
Copy link
Owner

"it’s detected as simplified but should be displayed as traditional. It only contains characters used in both traditional and simplified."
=> if it can be both, why "but should be displayed as traditional" :)

hmmm a easy-but-long solution would in the data-file to have not only traditional/simplify but also "both"
I need also to see what it implies in term of script detection

@jiru
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiru commented Feb 25, 2015

"it’s detected as simplified but should be displayed as traditional. It only contains characters used in both traditional and simplified."
=> if it can be both, why "but should be displayed as traditional" :)

Because the author (presumably) intended to write in traditional because (s)he is Taiwanese.

hmmm a easy-but-long solution would in the data-file to have not only traditional/simplify but also "both"

That would be a way. As I suggested in the other ticket, we may also let the user change the script.

@allan-simon
Copy link
Owner

ok I thought it was "traditional" in the sense of "without knowing the author intent we should havbe been able to guess"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants