Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Handling a greater range of input regarding DataFrame schemas #104

Open
sanalmert opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Handling a greater range of input regarding DataFrame schemas #104

sanalmert opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@sanalmert
Copy link

sanalmert commented Dec 18, 2024 •
edited by luccalb
Loading

User Story

  1. As an RTDIP developer
  2. I want to be able handle a greater range of input data
  3. So that I can offer more robust components and make them easier to use

Additional context

Acceptance Criteria

  • New methods are proposed to improve the robustness of our components
  • The imporvements should leverage our unified data validation, introduced in Unified input data validation #60

Definition of Done

  • Test cases have been created and are running successfully
  • Documentation for the new component was added
  • Github Actions are running without errors
@sanalmert sanalmert added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 18, 2024
@sanalmert sanalmert moved this to Product Backlog in amos2024ws01-feature-board Dec 18, 2024
@luccalb
Copy link

luccalb commented Jan 15, 2025

Discussing this, it seemed unclear how to approach this. We moved this to the end of the backlog for now.

@luccalb luccalb added wontfix This will not be worked on and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
amos2024ws01-feature-board
Status: Product Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@luccalb @sanalmert