-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Excit Integration: Iterators and Tiling Iterators #58
Comments
In GitLab by @perarnau on Apr 7, 2020, 13:37 changed the description |
In GitLab by @perarnau on Aug 14, 2020, 09:27 changed title from Excit Integration to Excit Integration{+: Iterators and Tiling Iterators+} |
In GitLab by @perarnau on Aug 14, 2020, 09:27 changed the description |
In GitLab by @perarnau on Aug 14, 2020, 10:17 changed the description |
1 similar comment
In GitLab by @perarnau on Aug 14, 2020, 10:17 changed the description |
In GitLab by @perarnau on Aug 14, 2020, 13:54 mentioned in merge request !149 |
In GitLab by @perarnau on Aug 19, 2020, 15:59 changed the description |
In GitLab by @perarnau on Apr 7, 2020, 13:34
Related to #21.
Might be blocked by #51
Integrating Excit
Choice between submodule and external dependency: submodule is easier for development.
Tiling Iterator API
First design choice: tiling iterator object or just a way to retrieve a retrieve a tile using an iterator state as input ?
One point of note: excit would be useful for other parts of AML, in particular topology management.
-> We've settled for an
index_byiter
for now, but we might need to do both in the end.Second design choice: do we need to be able to convert two-ways between tile and iterator ?
-> Leave it for now.
Integration
We need to port the mchpc19 dgemm to this interface.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: