Merge pull request #344 from anoma/zjcio-patch-15

Update governance.mdx

packages/specs/pages/modules/governance.mdx

@@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ Further information about delegators, validators, and NAM can be found in the [p
 
 There are two ways to propose a change to the Namada protocol:
 
-1. [**On-chain**](#on-chain-governance) - A proposal is submitted to the Namada blockchain, and the Namada blockchain handles the voting process.
-2. [**Off-chain**](#off-chain-governance) - A proposal is submitted to a focal point outside of the Namada blockchain, and the voting process occurs off-chain.
+1. [**On-chain**](https://specs.namada.net/modules/governance/on-chain) - A proposal is submitted to the Namada blockchain, and the Namada blockchain handles the voting process.
+2. [**Off-chain**](https://specs.namada.net/modules/governance/off-chain) - A proposal is submitted to a focal point outside of the Namada blockchain, and the voting process occurs off-chain.
 
 ## Spam resistance
 
 Namada governance implements a spam resistance mechanism to prevent the network from being spammed with proposals.
 This mechanism is based on the fact that a proposal must be submitted with a deposit of `NAM` tokens.
 This deposit is returned to the proposer if the proposal is accepted, and burned otherwise.
-This is only possible if the proposal is submitted on-chain, as off-chain proposals are not able to submit a deposit.
+This is only possible if the proposal is submitted on-chain, as off-chain proposals are not able to submit a deposit.