Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

namadac balance --owner $Shielded-aadress keeps printing "Converting Current Asset Type to Latest Asset Type" After Namada Hard Fork #3019

Closed
zaki9501 opened this issue Apr 7, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@zaki9501
Copy link

zaki9501 commented Apr 7, 2024

Description:
After the recent Namada hard fork, users are experiencing an issue with the namadac balance command. When attempting to check the shielded balance using this command, instead of displaying the shielded asset value, the command continuously prints the message "converting current asset type to latest asset type..." without providing the expected output. It is unclear whether this behavior is due to a bug or a glitch, but the command should provide the expected output as it did before the Namada hard fork.

Steps to Reproduce:

Execute the command namadac balance --owner $address to check the shielded balance, where $address is the address for which the balance is being queried.
Observe the output of the command, which continuously prints the message "converting current asset type to latest asset type..." without displaying the shielded asset value.
Expected Behavior:
The namadac balance command should accurately retrieve and display the shielded balance associated with the specified address, as it did before the Namada hard fork.

Actual Behavior:
Instead of displaying the shielded asset value, the command continuously prints the message "converting current asset type to latest asset type..." without providing the expected output.

Additional Information:

This issue started occurring after the recent Namada hard fork.
Users have reported encountering this issue consistently.
The problem seems to be specific to the retrieval and processing of shielded balance data.
The issue persists even after updating to the latest version of the Namada software.
Workaround:
As a workaround, users can try alternative methods to retrieve shielded balance data or consult community forums for potential solutions.

Impact:
This issue affects users who rely on the namadac balance command to check their shielded asset balances, potentially causing inconvenience and hindering their ability to monitor their assets accurately.

Next Steps:

Investigate the root cause of the issue, particularly any changes introduced during the Namada hard fork that may have impacted the namadac balance command.
Develop and implement a fix to address the issue and restore the expected behavior of the command.
Test the fix thoroughly to ensure that it resolves the issue without introducing any regressions.
Release the fix as part of a software update to provide users with a solution to the problem.
version v0.32.1
Attachments:
namadac balance --owner zvknam1qw0ufd22qqqqpqqn5pp03dkflh6w7m3rh8ut6mk9jefw2fy86v0hnphljl0n82t7x84hw02tumqeeqsa688rzw63f0cel739d6g2gy9g0gfrl2spcepv6yzyp0sllrajefj56nse0p60vdqut07m9qcvrj2gfza8pfrz3fxx4c6yd33swl3aqntn7d7x4jn7phth6mx03gfjkywhu07yxyex03wsfvmfn76356lc3pe594kku6x78apklmf5a0dwust9usx8fweng4s08hwmu
Last committed epoch: 80
converting current asset type to latest asset type...
converting current asset type to latest asset type...
converting current asset type to latest asset type...
converting current asset type to latest asset type...
converting current asset type to latest asset type...
converting current asset type to latest asset type...
converting current asset type to latest asset type...
converting current asset type to latest asset type...

@zaki9501 zaki9501 added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 7, 2024
@zaki9501
Copy link
Author

zaki9501 commented Apr 7, 2024

Description: After the recent Namada hard fork, users are experiencing an issue with the namadac balance command. When attempting to check the shielded balance using this command, instead of displaying the shielded asset value, the command continuously prints the message "converting current asset type to latest asset type..." without providing the expected output. It is unclear whether this behavior is due to a bug or a glitch, but the command should provide the expected output as it did before the Namada hard fork.

Steps to Reproduce:

Execute the command namadac balance --owner $address to check the shielded balance, where $address is the address for which the balance is being queried. Observe the output of the command, which continuously prints the message "converting current asset type to latest asset type..." without displaying the shielded asset value. Expected Behavior: The namadac balance command should accurately retrieve and display the shielded balance associated with the specified address, as it did before the Namada hard fork.

Actual Behavior: Instead of displaying the shielded asset value, the command continuously prints the message "converting current asset type to latest asset type..." without providing the expected output.

Additional Information:

This issue started occurring after the recent Namada hard fork. Users have reported encountering this issue consistently. The problem seems to be specific to the retrieval and processing of shielded balance data. The issue persists even after updating to the latest version of the Namada software. Workaround: As a workaround, users can try alternative methods to retrieve shielded balance data or consult community forums for potential solutions.

Impact: This issue affects users who rely on the namadac balance command to check their shielded asset balances, potentially causing inconvenience and hindering their ability to monitor their assets accurately.

Next Steps:

Investigate the root cause of the issue, particularly any changes introduced during the Namada hard fork that may have impacted the namadac balance command. Develop and implement a fix to address the issue and restore the expected behavior of the command. Test the fix thoroughly to ensure that it resolves the issue without introducing any regressions. Release the fix as part of a software update to provide users with a solution to the problem. version v0.32.1 Attachments: namadac balance --owner zvknam1qw0ufd22qqqqpqqn5pp03dkflh6w7m3rh8ut6mk9jefw2fy86v0hnphljl0n82t7x84hw02tumqeeqsa688rzw63f0cel739d6g2gy9g0gfrl2spcepv6yzyp0sllrajefj56nse0p60vdqut07m9qcvrj2gfza8pfrz3fxx4c6yd33swl3aqntn7d7x4jn7phth6mx03gfjkywhu07yxyex03wsfvmfn76356lc3pe594kku6x78apklmf5a0dwust9usx8fweng4s08hwmu Last committed epoch: 80 converting current asset type to latest asset type... converting current asset type to latest asset type... converting current asset type to latest asset type... converting current asset type to latest asset type... converting current asset type to latest asset type... converting current asset type to latest asset type... converting current asset type to latest asset type... converting current asset type to latest asset type...

Screenshot (175)
tried with the spending key alias too but the same output

@Rigorously
Copy link

Rigorously commented Apr 7, 2024

Try adding --no-conversions

You might then get something like
tnam1qxvg64psvhwumv3mwrrjfcz0h3t3274hwggyzcee | 2 : 2.3

@zaki9501
Copy link
Author

zaki9501 commented Apr 7, 2024

Try adding --no-conversions

You might then get something like tnam1qxvg64psvhwumv3mwrrjfcz0h3t3274hwggyzcee | 2 : 2.3

Last committed epoch: 83
tnam1p45l2n0tvd7nyvl75zl53a3w35s9qt8u8s4y5cmr : 5200000
tnam1qxvg64psvhwumv3mwrrjfcz0h3t3274hwggyzcee : 200000
tnam1qxvg64psvhwumv3mwrrjfcz0h3t3274hwggyzcee | 45 : 69
tnam1qxvg64psvhwumv3mwrrjfcz0h3t3274hwggyzcee | 49 : 60
tnam1qxvg64psvhwumv3mwrrjfcz0h3t3274hwggyzcee | 53 : 40

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented May 24, 2024

The balance command has been reworked; this should be fixed. Thank you for the reports.

@cwgoes cwgoes closed this as completed May 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants