Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement regexp_match, regexp_scalar_match and regexp_array_match for StringViewArray #6717

Open
Omega359 opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #6849
Open

implement regexp_match, regexp_scalar_match and regexp_array_match for StringViewArray #6717

Omega359 opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #6849
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Any new improvement worthy of a entry in the changelog

Comments

@Omega359
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.

We have implemented support for StringViewArray in arrow-rs (see #6163 and https://www.influxdata.com/blog/faster-queries-with-stringview-part-one-influxdb/ ) and to take full advantage of it, kernels that operate on strings (StringArray and LargeStringArray) need to be updated with specialized implementations that can

Natively operate on StringViewArray without having to covert first to StringArray
(Potentially) take advantage of the new string view layout

regexp_match is one of these functions that does not have native StringViewArray support yet

Describe the solution you'd like

  1. Implement regexp_match for StringViewArray
  2. Implement regexp_array_match for StringViewArray
  3. Implement regexp_scalar_match for StringViewArray
  4. Tests for same

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

#6370

@tlm365
Copy link
Contributor

tlm365 commented Dec 6, 2024

take

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Any new improvement worthy of a entry in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants