Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking: Reading iceberg tables. #123

Closed
5 of 6 tasks
liurenjie1024 opened this issue Dec 19, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed
5 of 6 tasks

Tracking: Reading iceberg tables. #123

liurenjie1024 opened this issue Dec 19, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@liurenjie1024
Copy link
Contributor

liurenjie1024 commented Dec 19, 2023

Now we have finished rest catalog to load table, reading/writing table metadata. The next step is to read iceberg tables using these apis.

@sdd
Copy link
Contributor

sdd commented Feb 19, 2024

If you are aiming just to have table reads working first, and optimizing them afterwards, then #124 is not completely necessary to do at this stage?

@liurenjie1024
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi, @sdd

If you are aiming just to have table reads working first, and optimizing them afterwards, then #124 is not completely necessary to do at this stage?

Yes, I think currently it's a relatively low priority task compared with others. But it's not that far away since this doesn't require huge effort, but careful design.

@Xuanwo
Copy link
Member

Xuanwo commented Jul 5, 2024

Is this tracking issue still relevant? Should we start a new one to better reflect the current status?

@liurenjie1024
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is this tracking issue still relevant? Should we start a new one to better reflect the current status?

Most of them are closed, but size based planning still not finished.

@Fokko
Copy link
Contributor

Fokko commented Nov 27, 2024

I would be in favor of closing this one, and just keep #128 :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants