Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature][SDK] Standardize existing functions #11049

Closed
2 tasks done
Zkplo opened this issue Sep 7, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #11339
Closed
2 tasks done

[Feature][SDK] Standardize existing functions #11049

Zkplo opened this issue Sep 7, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #11339
Labels
type/feature
Milestone
1.14.0

Comments

@Zkplo
Copy link
Contributor

Zkplo commented Sep 7, 2024

Description

  1. At present, many description comments for function classes are not detailed enough and have not been discussed for specific situations.
  2. Many function classes do not undergo NP check, resulting in errors and inconsistencies with the official defined return. For example, many official function definitions state that when a parameter is null, the function returns null instead of an error.

Use case

No response

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes, I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type/feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.14.0
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[INLONG-11049][SDK] Standardize existing functions Zkplo/inlong
2 participants
@aloyszhang @Zkplo