Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider needle package #152

Open
dubee opened this issue Jan 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Consider needle package #152

dubee opened this issue Jan 15, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@dubee
Copy link
Member

dubee commented Jan 15, 2018 •
edited
Loading

From @starpit

we should also consider switching to the needle package, as we did for the openwhisk npm. needle has proven to have much faster (and much better outlier) startup time -- saving perhaps 50-100ms. the request package has very poor load time performance. apache/openwhisk-client-js#77

https://github.com/tomas/needle
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dubee