You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently apertium-regtest test has output like this:
$ apertium-regtest -c .-morph test
Corpus 1 of 3: -s plurals-morph
13/13 (100.0%) tests pass (3/13 (23.08%) match gold)
Corpus 2 of 3: -es plurals-morph
20/20 (100.0%) tests pass (3/20 (15.0%) match gold)
Corpus 3 of 3: irregular plurals-morph
22/22 (100.0%) tests pass (2/22 (9.09%) match gold)
All tests pass.
It would be nice if the bottom line (or somewhere around there) said something like "8/55 tests match gold" or similar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
"All tests pass" is correct. Gold is not relevant to test passing - gold is just an extra step to keep track of "perfect" translations, but has nothing to do with whether the translation changed.
This is not a gold tester, and must not be a gold tester. It's an important distinction and different mindset.
This is not a gold tester, and must not be a gold tester.
Okay, sure, but for morphology this will be the primary use, especially for those of us using it as a replacement for aq-morphtest and morhp-test.py. So, okay, leave the terminology and mindset as is, but we could still use some minor additional features that resemble gold testing to make it more useful for morphology work.
Currently
apertium-regtest test
has output like this:It would be nice if the bottom line (or somewhere around there) said something like "8/55 tests match gold" or similar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: