consider change to Context::upsert() #1062
Locked
garypen
started this conversation in
Implementation
Replies: 1 comment
-
Locking discussion as this change has been made. See: #1070 and #1073. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently,
upsert()
takes a parameter to specify a default value. It might be more complex than we need. We could simply specify that values inserted viaupsert()
areDefault
.I checked and this wouldn't break any code in the current router codebase.
What do people think? Good idea or leave things alone?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions