Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

operator.scanSecretTTL not getting respect #2208

Closed
zyue110026 opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

operator.scanSecretTTL not getting respect #2208

zyue110026 opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@zyue110026
Copy link

We have noticed an instance of incorrect helming in one of your Kubernetes configuration files. Hardcoded or default configuration values in the template are considered anti-pattern and configurable values in the values.yaml file are not being respect, resulting in user-provided configurations never being applied. Additionally, we provide anecdotal evidence from trivy-operator#729 regarding the incorrect helming defect.

What steps did you take and what happened:

  1. changing the operator.scanSecretTTL value to any value in values.yaml file.
  2. using helm chart to deploy trivy operator
    [A clear and concise description of what the bug is, and what commands you ran.]

operator.scanSecretTTL does not take affect when changed to other values.

What did you expect to happen:

scanSecretTTL value should changed.

Anything else you would like to add:

[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]

Environment:

  • Trivy-Operator version (use trivy-operator version): main version
  • Kubernetes version (use kubectl version):
  • OS (macOS 10.15, Windows 10, Ubuntu 19.10 etc):
@zyue110026 zyue110026 added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Jul 30, 2024
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been labeled with inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and will be auto-closed. label Sep 29, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant