You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue kicks off activities toward a comparison activity between thorium and uranium fuel cycles to be conducted by @jbae11 (now @ZoeRichter ???) . To serve this activity, this literature review should:
be reflected (by adding reviewed papers to a folder) in the group zotero
identify all similar work in this area, summarize the methods and conclusions.
be recorded in a document resembling the literature review chapter of an MS thesis
identify common metrics used to evaluate the sustainability of a fuel cycle or similar system
determine the promise of these metrics for evaluating a dynamic rather than static scenario (that is, some static metrics may not make sense in a dynamic scenario and vice versa)
identify the technologies to compare in these transition scenarios
identify appropriate reactor specifications for representing the technologies to be compared
(it was proposed by @jbae11 that this issue should have a deadline of 12/20)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue kicks off activities toward a comparison activity between thorium and uranium fuel cycles to be conducted by
@jbae11(now @ZoeRichter ???) . To serve this activity, this literature review should:(it was proposed by @jbae11 that this issue should have a deadline of 12/20)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: