From adf0f15a06c6e8ddd1a6d59b28efcbb26289f080 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Quentin Agren Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 14:32:43 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] gh-110138: Improve grammar in idiomatic usage of ``__main__.py`` (#110142) --- Doc/library/__main__.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/library/__main__.rst b/Doc/library/__main__.rst index fd60d92d4eb0f9..d378e40b3906c6 100644 --- a/Doc/library/__main__.rst +++ b/Doc/library/__main__.rst @@ -238,9 +238,9 @@ package. For more details, see :ref:`intra-package-references` in the Idiomatic Usage ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -The contents of ``__main__.py`` typically isn't fenced with -``if __name__ == '__main__'`` blocks. Instead, those files are kept short, -functions to execute from other modules. Those other modules can then be +The content of ``__main__.py`` typically isn't fenced with an +``if __name__ == '__main__'`` block. Instead, those files are kept +short and import functions to execute from other modules. Those other modules can then be easily unit-tested and are properly reusable. If used, an ``if __name__ == '__main__'`` block will still work as expected