Skip to content

issues Search Results · repo:arturictus/sidekiq_alive language:Ruby

Filter by

43 results
 (71 ms)

43 results

inarturictus/sidekiq_alive (press backspace or delete to remove)

Hello, I ve encountered an issue in my Sidekiq logs. I m seeing the following error message repeated 74 times in the last 3 hours: { severity : ERROR , message : Can t find the alive key , @timestamp ...
  • saiqulhaq-hh
  • Opened 
    on Nov 21, 2024
  • #132

In puma documentation the signal USR1 restarts the server, this creates a lot of processes to sidekiq. Screenshot from 2024-11-12 10-56-06 So change signal to TSTP fix this, this signal is equal quiet ...
  • ArmandoAssuncao
  • Opened 
    on Nov 6, 2024
  • #131

@quiet - Time.now will always be smaller than quiet_timeout, so, if the sidekiq process is in quiet mode manually or the process does not die, the health check will continue return 200. https://github.com/arturictus/sidekiq_alive/blob/a531833b8bd424a67bdd5a310d68a2f8b1c52025/lib/sidekiq_alive/server/rack.rb#L53-L55 ...
  • ArmandoAssuncao
  • Opened 
    on Nov 6, 2024
  • #130

I m having trouble getting the liveness probe to use HTTPS, any guides?
invalid
  • MattKitmanLabs
  • 3
  • Opened 
    on Jul 15, 2024
  • #128

JRuby does not support forking, which is used here to spaw the rack server. I have a draft fork where I just replaced processes for threads, and it seems to be working fine for JRuby. Is there anything ...
  • roque86
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Jun 11, 2024
  • #127

It would be very useful to have additional validation layer that checks sidekiq-alive is working in a real app scenario. This could be done based on packaging example app in to a docker container and ...
ci
  • andrcuns
  • 6
  • Opened 
    on Dec 2, 2023
  • #107

Seems like the way the queues are maintained, it s not set up to garbage collect after a deployment. Leaving me with: Screenshot 2023-10-23 at 4 46 49 PM Seems like everyone would have this issue. What ...
  • kylelikesboatstuff
  • 3
  • Opened 
    on Oct 23, 2023
  • #104

Hi All, We are running sidekiq_alive 2.3 with sidekiq 7.0.8 (and Rails 6.1.7.4). This is running outside Kubernetes in Google Cloud Platform s AppEngine. We have our deployment set up so when a new version ...
  • koconnor-ampion
  • 18
  • Opened 
    on Oct 6, 2023
  • #100

We are trying to upgrade our infrastructure to use sidekiq 7 and facing the following issue: sidekiq_alive works fine when registering the worker in redis, then it becomes healthy. After exactly 10 minutes ...
  • w32-blaster
  • 30
  • Opened 
    on Jul 25, 2023
  • #94

Thanks for the work on sidekiq-alive. After a recent update (to 2.2 and sidekiq 7.1), I see following errors on a multi-instance installation regularly (not reproducible, 1-x times per day under no load). ...
  • fwolfst
  • 6
  • Opened 
    on May 4, 2023
  • #89
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Restrict your search to the title by using the in:title qualifier.
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Press the
/
key to activate the search input again and adjust your query.
Issue search results · GitHub