Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NewStory: Revise the UI to use the Android Design Patterns #72

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 1, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

The first Alpha of the new DaisyReader app uses a single press to hear what the 
selection is and a long-press to select the item. These actions are not 
consistent with the majority of Android apps and our alpha testers found the UI 
hard to fathom until they were told what they needed to do. The app also worked 
reasonably well with explore-by-touch for the tester who is visually-impaired 
who prefers the 'visual mode' in terms of usability.

Therefore we would like to revise the user inputs to be more closely aligned 
with the Android guidelines. As the app is also aimed at users with Android 2.x 
and needs to work well for users who rely on audio feedback (the self-voicing 
aspect of the app) where Accessibility support is less developed for 2.x we may 
need to revise the UI design to balance these needs with those of working well 
for Android 4.x devices.





Original issue reported on code.google.com by julianharty on 19 Jun 2013 at 9:44

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I have posted comments in the story #65 
(https://code.google.com/p/android-daisy-epub-reader/issues/detail?id=65). 

Original comment by [email protected] on 25 Jun 2013 at 8:57

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by [email protected] on 24 Jul 2013 at 8:50

  • Changed state: Started
  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant