From b6b7a67191560ab55d47284d8da3e611e70f9fe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaime Forero-Romero Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 15:40:59 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] referee --- paper/referee.md | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/paper/referee.md b/paper/referee.md index 783f171..2d88008 100644 --- a/paper/referee.md +++ b/paper/referee.md @@ -344,8 +344,12 @@ It was "between" and is already corrected in the text. >assumptions. We checked explicitly that the correlation between the halos can be -discarded. We mention that in the text. - +discarded, i.e. we ran everything using a six dimensional gaussian +distribution instead of two 3d gaussian distribution. +We don't find any clear trend of the asphericity with the mass or +companion distance. +This is probably due to the small number of pairs we have. +We mention that in the text. * section 4.5, second last paragraph: > median halo masses are stated for the simulated analogues. Can the