Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create create-template in AsyncAPI organization #337

Closed
jonaslagoni opened this issue Jul 18, 2021 · 28 comments · Fixed by #1476
Closed

Create create-template in AsyncAPI organization #337

jonaslagoni opened this issue Jul 18, 2021 · 28 comments · Fixed by #1476
Assignees
Labels
bounty AsyncAPI Bounty program related label enhancement New feature or request released

Comments

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Sponsor Member

jonaslagoni commented Jul 18, 2021

Reason/Context

Stumbled upon this and thought it would be perfect for the generator. We could offer a way to use the init function which will allow people to more quickly setup new templates.

By creating create-template in the AsyncAPI scope we can do the following example commands:

  • npm init @asyncapi/template --react
  • npm init @asyncapi/template --nunjucks
  • npm init @asyncapi/template

Description

This will significantly speed up the process of creating new ones and make it more accessible for people. This is similar to what React have - https://github.com/facebook/create-react-app

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 18, 2021
@magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Member

magicmatatjahu commented Jul 19, 2021

I think that we should move this issue to the CLI repo. What do you think @jonaslagoni?

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Sponsor Member Author

I think that we should move this issue to the CLI repo. What do you think @jonaslagoni?

I am not sure the CLI will be able to do this in a way it makes sense. Cause otherwise, we would need to run something like npm init @asyncapi/cli --template --react instead 🤔 Not sure we want to overcomplicate it? The @asyncapi/template repo could of course be used by the CLI repo to enable it natively.

Another thought is whether npm init would be needed if it can be done through the CLI? 🤔

@magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Member

magicmatatjahu commented Jul 26, 2021

We can reuse the https://github.com/asyncapi/create-glee-app pattern to create the template for templates (LOL 😄 ) and then we can even use npx:

npx @asyncapi/template --react

Another thought is whether npm init would be needed if it can be done through the CLI? 🤔

No, but then we should have option to generate template without AsyncAPi doc, to reuse our generator.

npx @asyncapi/cli generate --template @asyncapi/template -p engine=react

or something like that

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 60 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Sep 25, 2021
@derberg derberg removed the stale label Dec 22, 2021
@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Dec 22, 2021

we already have template for templates, why not rework it to support it, I like the idea

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Sponsor Member Author

we already have template for templates, why not rework it to support it, I like the idea

That could be an idea, yes!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Apr 22, 2022
@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Apr 26, 2022

shouldn't we move it to CLI repo?

@derberg derberg removed the stale label Apr 26, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added stale and removed stale labels Aug 25, 2022
@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Sponsor Member Author

We should yes 😄 @derberg I don't have permissions for it 🙂

@derberg derberg transferred this issue from asyncapi/generator Sep 13, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 12, 2023
@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Apr 3, 2023

I think we should follow the same direction that will be done with #418

@Shurtu-gal
Copy link
Collaborator

@derberg @jonaslagoni can I work on this?

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Jun 28, 2023

yeah, but problem is not the implementation, we need a clear definition of the project that we would like to have generated with this new command. Some brainstorming session is kinda needed

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 27, 2023
@Shurtu-gal
Copy link
Collaborator

Still Relevant 🤝

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Oct 29, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Feb 27, 2024
@Shurtu-gal
Copy link
Collaborator

Still relevant 🤝

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Feb 28, 2024
@AayushSaini101
Copy link
Contributor

AayushSaini101 commented Jun 6, 2024

I want to work on this. :)

Thank you @Amzani for accepting the suggestion for sumitting this issue for Q3 Bounty Program. Here is my past experience in CLI and Past Bounty Issues:

@DhairyaMajmudar
Copy link

DhairyaMajmudar commented Jun 11, 2024

Hi @derberg @jonaslagoni I would love to work on this issue, actually I am developing a similar kind of npm package https://github.com/DhairyaMajmudar/majirya-cli

This package is a CLI Tool which simplifies mern stack and T3 stack web development.

@Amzani
Copy link
Collaborator

Amzani commented Jun 11, 2024

Hi @DhairyaMajmudar @AayushSaini101 was the first to express his interest in working on this issue.
Feel free to pick the other issues in the project.

Thanks

@DhairyaMajmudar
Copy link

Sure looking forward to apply for an another issue, thank you : )

@AayushSaini101
Copy link
Contributor

We can implement a command that is asyncapi init that will generate a template for the user, and we have already have template of template structure https://github.com/asyncapi/template-for-generator-templates we can simply use it @Amzani @Souvikns

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot added the bounty AsyncAPI Bounty program related label label Jun 17, 2024
@aeworxet
Copy link
Contributor

Bounty Issue's service comment

Text labels: bounty/2024-Q3, bounty/advanced, bounty/coding
First assignment to third-party contributors: 2024-06-21 00:00:00 UTC+12:00
End Of Life after: 2024-07-31 23:59:59 UTC-12:00

@asyncapi/bounty_team

The Bounty Program is not a Mentorship Program. The accepted level of Bounty Program Participants is Middle/Senior.
Third-party contributors should coherently articulate how they are going to approach the resolution process when expressing a desire to work on this Bounty Issue.

@AayushSaini101
Copy link
Contributor

AayushSaini101 commented Jun 18, 2024

The current command to generate the glee project is asyncapi new glee --name , and we need to generate only for react engine template because it is more efficient. In that case, we can introduce the new command that is :
asyncapi new template --name .
and the structure of the template will be:

asyncapitemplate
  -->template
 ------>index.js 
  --->package.json

Reference template format for react engine: https://www.asyncapi.com/docs/tools/generator/template-development. thoughts @peter-rr @jonaslagoni I will create a PR after that

@aeworxet
Copy link
Contributor

Bounty Issue's Timeline

Complexity Level Assignment Date (by GitHub) Start Date (by BP Rules) End Date (by BP Rules) Draft PR Submission Final PR Merge Start Final PR Merge End
Advanced 2024-06-18 2024-07-01 2024-08-25 2024-07-21 2024-08-11 2024-08-25
Please note that the dates given represent deadlines, not specific dates, so if the goal is reached sooner, it's better.
Keep in mind the responsibility for violations of the Timeline.

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 2.1.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@aeworxet
Copy link
Contributor

@Amzani
Please confirm the technical resolution of this Bounty Issue or delegate this action to other Maintainers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bounty AsyncAPI Bounty program related label enhancement New feature or request released
Projects
Status: Completed
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

9 participants