Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RP and RA use cases and best practicies #187

Open
dsvetlov opened this issue Apr 19, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

RP and RA use cases and best practicies #187

dsvetlov opened this issue Apr 19, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@dsvetlov
Copy link
Contributor

Hi all,

I have seen an interesting discussion about RP usage.

I would like to talk about your and my use cases for response playbooks. In my ATC installation, RPs are mainly used as "Triage" instructions. So the biggest part of my RP is focused on the identification of a threat, search of additional information and adding more context in case. After that escalation for 2nd line of SOC. In some simple cases, of course, there are other actions for containment.

Maybe we do need to separate "Triage phase" from others?
What are your use cases of RP?

@yugoslavskiy
Copy link
Member

Hello @dsvetlov !

Sorry for the late reply.

Maybe we do need to separate "Triage phase" from others?

Yes, some sort of separation is totally required.
But I don't think that it makes sense to develop a separate IR Stage for it, because basically the activity under "Triage" actions perfectly fit into the existing stages (Identification, Containment, and in some cases — Eradication). It doesn't make much sense to create such separation on that level.

I would suggest creating Playbooks with a prefix "Triage" in the title. Or maybe we could add a category or a special tag to the Playbook template, and then automatically categorize it as a Triage Playbook.

What do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants