You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
One of the primary drivers for the C implementation is the small footprint needed by customers asking for NoPorts on OpenWRT devices.
Describe the solution you'd like
A package that works with OpenWRT 23.05 across a broad range of system architectures (e.g. armv7, armv8, mipsel)
Describe alternatives you've considered
It's likely that there will be demand for older versions of OpenWRT where customers have their own distributions based on them. We should approach those on a case by case basis to determine the footprint, architecture and preferred TLS implementation.
Additional context
Whilst we can run the Python sshnpd on OpenWRT there's generally insufficient storage for all of the dependencies (~100MB).
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
One of the primary drivers for the C implementation is the small footprint needed by customers asking for NoPorts on OpenWRT devices.
Describe the solution you'd like
A package that works with OpenWRT 23.05 across a broad range of system architectures (e.g. armv7, armv8, mipsel)
Describe alternatives you've considered
It's likely that there will be demand for older versions of OpenWRT where customers have their own distributions based on them. We should approach those on a case by case basis to determine the footprint, architecture and preferred TLS implementation.
Additional context
Whilst we can run the Python sshnpd on OpenWRT there's generally insufficient storage for all of the dependencies (~100MB).
atsign-foundation/noports#633
atsign-foundation/noports#670
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: