Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't advise use of masonry.pkgd.js or flickity.pkgd.js #59

Open
desandro opened this issue Feb 10, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Don't advise use of masonry.pkgd.js or flickity.pkgd.js #59

desandro opened this issue Feb 10, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@desandro
Copy link

desandro commented Feb 10, 2016

Hi there! I see in User Contributed Examples you are advising users to use masonry.pkgd.js and flickity.pkgd.js, for Masonry and Flickity. I wonder if there is a better way? These files are best used when you want to include them in a demo or page, right in a <script> or <link> tag. But they should not be uses in package managers because they include in their dependencies.

I'm not familiar with your tool, but I'd like to help. Can we recommend another solution?

I imagine part of the issue is the interpretation that bower.json's main should list all its files. Bower spec now states

The entry-point files necessary to use your package. Only one file per filetype.

See related discussions and solutions in metafizzy/outlayer#33

--- Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/30722872-don-t-advise-use-of-masonry-pkgd-js-or-flickity-pkgd-js?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F8853550&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F8853550&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant