Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Read dawr with perf interface #2869

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

akanksha216
Copy link
Contributor

Add new test cases for reading single DAWR register and multiple DAWR registers with perf interface

Add new test cases for reading single DAWR register and
multiple DAWR registers with perf interface

Signed-off-by: Akanksha J N <[email protected]>
@akanksha216
Copy link
Contributor Author

Opened this PR based on the below comment : #2772 (comment)

if not any(x in val for x in power_ver):
self.cancel("LPAR on Power10 and above is required for this test.")
if "power10" not in cpu.get_family():
self.cancel("Test is supported only on IBM POWER10 platform")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will revert the power11 support changes. Can you rebase the code?

i = 0
if self.distro_name == "fedora":
child.sendline('set debuginfod enabled on')
child.expect_exact([pexpect.TIMEOUT, ''])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same. This will revert code added via trace: Add Fedora Support to trace testing. Can you rebase?

"""
Setting Read/Write watchpoints on two variables using awatch and
executing the program
"""
child, return_value = self.run_cmd('dawr_v2')
i = 0
if self.distro_name == "fedora":
child.sendline('set debuginfod enabled on')
child.expect_exact([pexpect.TIMEOUT, ''])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

Copy link
Member

@PraveenPenguin PraveenPenguin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@akanksha216 just adopts suggestion from @sacsant so we are good to go

@sacsant
Copy link
Contributor

sacsant commented Sep 3, 2024

@PraveenPenguin should we ask someone on behalf of Akanksha to resubmit this PR?

@PraveenPenguin
Copy link
Member

@PraveenPenguin should we ask someone on behalf of Akanksha to resubmit this PR?

@sacsant i am working to add these changes using the maintainer ACL so we should not drop Akanksha's credit , i closed another PR to take care same

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants